Agility
Project Management
Scrum
IT Strategy

There is no time for this. — @Maximalfocus

Waterfall in Jira – Why So Many Agile Projects Fail

“We kind of do Scrum.”

An innocent sentence – that actually says everything. There are sprints, maybe even dailies, and of course: Jira. But the roadmap is fully scheduled through December, all features are already promised, and the team is sprinting from deadline to deadline – under growing pressure.

What’s being sold as an agile project is often classic waterfall in agile disguise. Velocity replaces the Gantt chart. Jira becomes a control center. Developers aren’t contributors – they’re ticket processors.

Worse still: Under the banner of agility, decisions often become even more chaotic – because requirements are changed spontaneously and without context. It’s sold as “being agile” – but in truth, it’s directionless. And destructive.

The result:

Frustration in the team
Technical debt
Micromanagement
No real adaptability
Loss of trust in the entire process

And still you hear: “We work agile.”

This article explores why so many agile projects fail despite using Scrum – and what project leads and IT decision-makers can do to create real value.

Note: Scrum is only one of many agile methods.

Why Agile Projects Fail

Many projects call themselves “agile” – but behave just like they used to. Frameworks like Scrum or Kanban are introduced, but not understood. What remains is a process that looks agile – but acts like waterfall. Just faster and more frantic.

Typical patterns:

Planning stays rigid: Roadmaps are filled months in advance, and sprints are just for execution.
Commitments become deadlines: Instead of forecasts, there are fixed expectations. No flexibility – just pressure.
Jira becomes an end in itself: Tickets replace conversations. Workflows are over-optimized instead of staying adaptable.
Teams lose ownership: Decisions move upwards. The team delivers, but doesn’t shape the outcome.

The method may still look right – but the meaning is lost. Sprint by sprint.

Scrum on Paper? How to Spot Fake Agility

Many teams run sprints – but deliver like it’s waterfall. Meetings happen, boards look neat, the process seems clean. But daily work tells a different story.

Common warning signs:

Sprint planning takes forever. Because everything was already decided – and no one wants to say it’s too much.
Requirements change mid-sprint. Not because it makes sense – but because “someone needs something.”
Retrospectives have no effect. Things are discussed – but nothing changes. Feedback goes nowhere.
Technical topics are ignored. Architecture, testing, infrastructure – no room in the sprint, no room in conversation.
The team no longer asks “Why?”, only “How much?” Engagement drops. Responsibility fades. Motivation follows.

The project looks agile – but it no longer works that way. Sprint by sprint.

Why Things Go Wrong

Many teams use Scrum or other agile methods – but without embracing the principles. The framework is there. The ceremonies happen. But the impact is missing. Why? Because the wrong things are being managed.

Technical work gets pushed aside. Refactoring, testing, architecture – it’s all postponed. Instead, the focus is on delivering features quickly. The technical foundation suffers, development slows down. The team feels it – and disengages.
Trust is replaced by control. Jira becomes the control tower, standups become status reports. When delivery is everything, no one takes real responsibility. Initiative dries up.
Decisions come from the outside. The team receives pre-defined tickets – no context, no discussion. If no one’s asking you, you stop thinking along. Execution without ownership is what remains.
Learning doesn’t happen. Retros take place – but nothing changes. The same problems repeat, good ideas get lost. The process stays as it is – Sprint by sprint.

What Good Agile Projects Do Differently

You don’t recognize good agile projects by their boards or artifacts – but by the mindset in the team. The framework is a tool. What matters is how it’s lived.

What they do differently:

Plan with clear focus. Goals are clear, scope is realistic, and there's room for the unexpected. The team is involved in planning – and leadership sticks to it.
Put responsibility in the team. Decisions about scope, architecture, and implementation stay where the expertise lives. Trust isn’t a slogan – it’s a requirement.
Make space for technical work. Refactoring, testing, infrastructure – it’s all part of the sprint. Not eventually – but regularly.
Use retrospectives to steer. Problems are addressed, actions taken. What’s reflected on becomes input for planning. Step by step. Sprint by sprint.
Prioritize impact over volume. It’s not about how many features – it’s about what reaches users. Good teams deliver outcomes – not just output.

These projects work differently. Not louder, not faster – but clearer. And that’s what makes the difference.

Tips for Project Leads

Agile teams don’t need perfect methodology – they need the right conditions. If you lead projects, you influence how teams work. Whether they have to deliver – or are able to.

Here are some concrete ways to help:

Plan less, prioritize more. Roadmaps are fine – as long as they’re not treated as contracts. Think in goals. Allow things to change.
Protect team capacity. Meetings, pings, spontaneous requests – all of it eats focus. If you want productive work, give your team time for it. Less noise, more results.
Make technical work visible. Architecture, testing, and infrastructure need time in the sprint – not after hours. If you don’t ask about it, it’ll be skipped.
Take retros seriously. Listen. And act. When the team speaks up, it’s not a threat – it’s a gift.
Demystify Jira. Use the tool – but don’t let it do the thinking. No workflow replaces a conversation. No ticket replaces ownership.

A good project isn’t built on control – but on clarity, direction, and trust. Everything else is just waterfall on a sprint schedule.

Conclusion

Many projects claim to be agile – but still run like waterfall. The difference isn’t in the tool or the process. It’s in the mindset.

Agility isn’t a method – it’s an attitude: Focus instead of chaos. Ownership instead of control. Learning instead of repetition.

Those who get that lay the foundation for real change. Not perfect, but honest. Not loud, but effective. Sprint by sprint.